Supporting
Organizations:





DAMA1:
DAMA1
Follow-Up Page
PDMIC
Review
Midrange
Enterprise Review
|
Concurrent Track A -
Integrated Product Realization
OVERVIEW
There are several enablers for design anywhere – manufacture
anywhere. Among these enablers, and perhaps the most obvious, are
the Internet and collaboration environments. However, I contend that
the secret to design anywhere – manufacture anywhere is found,
neither in the Internet nor in collaborative tools. It is found in
integrated product development and manufacturing based on the best
information, developed and presented in the best manner, and
compliant with emerging standards. It is about seamless integration
– from innovation - to conceptual design - to detailed design - to
products produced in intelligent, closed loop systems. It is about
developing products based on requirements, designed for optimized
performance and efficiency. It is about the right processes with the
right parameters, yielding products that are right the first time
and every time. How does this vision support design anywhere –
manufacture anywhere? Because the information flow is seamless and
the development environment is integrated, the "manufacturing bible"
for the product is developed as part of the process, and the
complete information from which to make product can be delivered in
the right form to any location. Hence, product and process
development techniques, along with modeling and simulation tools,
have matured to the point that totally automated product and process
development is within our grasp, and tremendous efficiencies in the
cost and time of getting the right products to market are just over
the horizon.
This vision of
integrated product realization is one of the major themes of
technology roadmaps, developed under contract with the federal
government in support of the nation’s manufacturing infrastructure.
Over 400 manufacturing experts from over 150 organizations
participated in the process of creating the best visions for
manufacturing’s future and in defining the migration plan from where
we are, to where we need to go. The roadmaps are the foundation for
a new non-profit organization called the Integrated Manufacturing
Technology Initiative that is leading an industry/government
implementation activity. Integrated product realization is one area
of focus in implementation.
While this vision of
integrated product realization as defined in the roadmaps may be
viewed by some as unrealistic, the pieces are falling in place
quickly. The vision is within our grasp. In this session today, we
want to unfold that vision for you. In fact, we want to "peal the
onion" in increasing levels of detail. We will go from the
high-level blue-sky discussion, to a discussion of what is now being
accomplished in today’s edge of the art applications. Bob Burleson
will make this presentation. Martin Hardwick, President of STEP
Tools incorporated will follow Bob with a discussion of a
demonstration that his organization recently coordinated. The
emphasis that you will hear from Martin will be the completeness of
the product model, and the ability to drive that product model
directly to the machine controller. Martin will highlight their
experience and will also make you aware of related activities with
other programs – like direct programming of 5 axis milling machines.
Bill Simons will continue the unfolding of the enabling technologies
that make integrated product realization doable. Bill will talk
about and demonstrate a tool that break the solid model into the
features, bridging the gap between design features and manufacturing
features. The major point is that if we can break the model into
features, we can do anything that needs to be done with the
information – including automated selection of the best processes
and process parameters and the automated programming of the machine
tools.
In Mr. Burleson’s
presentation, you’ll learn about integrated product realization by
looking at what has been accomplished and what is being done today.
He will briefly highlight the results of the Technologies Enabling
Agile Manufacturing program that pioneered many of the concepts that
are now maturing. Bob will talk about the various approaches being
taken by the major programs – from General Motors Math Based
Manufacturing to G.E’s concept of the federated model. From the
government viewpoint, he will highlight the 10s of millions of
dollars that are being spent each year in programs like ADAPT, TIME,
IMSA, ISE, and others. However, the substance of this presentation
will not end with who is doing what. Enabling technologies that make
integrated product realization possible will be overviewed. These
technologies will include the "virtual cockpit", and the web
integration manager (WIM). Model-based manufacturing will be
discussed as will an operating system that integrates PDM in a
totally integrated, web-based environment using the WIM.
One of the major
requirements for design anywhere – manufacture anywhere is the
ability to exchange data and achieve interoperability. The STEP
activity has been underway for years, and has matured to the point
that "cursing the darkness" is no longer necessary. STEP Tools is
the leader of a project, funded by the NIST ATP program, that has as
its objective the demonstration of one of the STEP protocols, STEP
NC in establishing the direct link from the product model to the
machine tool. In a demonstration in November, the full process was
shown. The product model was imported, the features were extracted,
the process was planned, and the STEP NC formatted data was
downloaded to the machine tool to make the part. In real time,
changes were made to the design, and additional features were
machined. This demonstration highlights the trend - from product
design – not only to solid free form fabrication – but directly to
real parts made on standard manufacturing equipment in quantities
necessary to satisfy customers. Dr. Hartman will discuss the
super-model project and other activities that are making the vision
of product data driving processing equipment a reality.
There are key
enablers that make integrated product realization possible. Mr.
Burleson discussed some of them in his presentation. Mr. Hardwick
highlighted STEP NC and some of the tools used in the demonstration.
Bill Simons will discuss and demonstrate another critical
capability.
One of the major
barriers to integrated product realization is the incompatibility of
the languages of product design and process planning. We design
products by creating features from parameters. In the traditional
mindset, we then establish process plans that use the parametric
information. In advanced applications, we "pick" the features that
are needed for planning and we extract the needed geometric
information. The direction is toward feature based creation of a
single object that provides all information needed to manufacture
the product. FBTOL and FBMACH are major strides in the right
direction. For a rich feature set, these tools automatically extract
the features from the model, attach the correct tolerancing
information, and provide a data file capable of driving the planning
systems. Computer Aided Manufacturing systems can use this
information directly to perform the process planning functions.
Further, automated planning and programming systems are a natural
extension.
In these
presentations, the vision for design anywhere – manufacture anywhere
based on a new vision of product and process development has been
discussed. The concept of integrated product realization, with
location as a non-factor, is emerging as an important direction for
product development. Over the last 20 years, tremendous strides have
been made in product and process development. However, most of the
changes have been incremental based on traditional design concepts.
While the incremental changes have taken place, the enabling tools
have matured. Companies like Pratt Whitney have seen design costs
for new aircraft engines cut in half. The automotive companies have
seen dramatic changes in the costs and time for new product
development. Maybe it’s time for radical new thinking. Maybe it’s
time to fully exploit the knowledge management and modeling and
simulation capability that exists today. Maybe it’s time to realize
seamlessly integrated product realization – from requirements to
conceptual design, to design optimization , to product –
"automagically" and realize a 10X improvement in the
product development cycle.
An
Emerging Vision of Location
Independent Product Realization
Richard Neal, Executive Director, Integrated Manufacturing
Initiative (IMTI)
Requirements-based
design, product data management, modeling and simulation, and
knowledge-based manufacturing planning systems have matured from
emerging capabilities to "ready for integrated
implementation." Totally automated design of the best product and
selection and planning of the right processes, optimized for total
performance, is within our grasp. Further, intelligent controls are
emerging that can operate from the process models to assure
in-control processes and 100% certainty of quality product. These
capabilities make location-independent, integrated product
realization a reality.
The
Integrated Manufacturing Technology Initiative (IMTI) is a
public/private partnership dedicated to the creation of a consensus
vision for manufacturing and the facilitation of technology R&D
activities to achieve that vision. A rich set of roadmaps is in
place that defines the current state, the vision, and the plan to
achieve the vision. Integrated product realization is a key theme of
these documents. In this presentation, the vision for
location-independent product realization and automated product and
process development will be illuminated. Further, the stage will be
set for the discussions following in the session.
The
STEP International Data Standard
Evolves into Manufacturing
Martin Hardwick, President, STEP Tools, Inc.
There has
always been a mismatch between the lifetimes of software systems and
the information they produce.CAD systems change every two to three
years, but blueprints and manufacturing plans often must be kept for
thirty years or more. However, the information content of a plane,
ship or building does not depend on what technology is used to store
and manage the data. A minivan is built from the same parts
regardless of whether its parts list is stored as punched cards, a
relational database or Enterprise JavaBeans. Therefore, standards
are being created that are system independent, technology neutral
and extensible over time so that product model data can be moved
between systems when desirable or necessary.
STEP began when the developers of IGES, SET and VDAFS realized it
wasn’t sensible for each nation to produce its own standard for
product model data. The STEP standard was initiated in 1985 and is
different from its predecessors in the range of data it supports and
the sophistication of its internal architecture. The predecessors
were basically standards for geometry data. Some extensions were
made but IGES, for example, was the Initial Graphics Exchange
Specification: Initial meaning first solution, graphics meaning
drawings, exchange meaning no data sharing and specification meaning
a solution meant for the United States only.
STEP is a modular and
extensible family of standards for product model data. The goal of
STEP is to develop a complete, full 3D model of a product for its
entire life cycle from initial design to final disposal. The STEP
standard is managed by the International Standards Organization
(ISO) and divided into many parts. Most of the parts are managed as
ISO10303, but there are related parts under ISO 14649 (STEP-NC) and
ISO 13584 (Parts Libraries).
The core of STEP is a
catalog of reusable engineering definitions known as the Integrated
Resources. STEP Integrated Resources have been defined for geometry,
product identification, assembly structure, configuration control,
finite element analysis, drawing, electrical circuits, piping,
manufacturing features, tooling, manufacturing strategy and
manufacturing processes. The resources have been used in more than
20 models within STEP and an unknown number of models outside of
STEP.
A STEP product model
identifies and constrains a subset of the integrated resources to
meet the requirements of an engineering activity. The models are
called Application Protocols because they meet the requirements of a
defined set of applications. Each Protocol has a name and a number.
For example AP-203, also called Configuration Controlled Design,
defines a data model for assemblies of 3D solid models.
STEP is rapidly
becoming the preferred standard for communicating product data
between CAD systems. At one large corporation the usage of STEP for
supply chain communication has grown from 0% in 1998 to 17% in 1999,
and 30% in 2000. At this rate of growth it will surpass IGES as the
preferred format for technical data communication in 2002. More than
a million CAD stations now contain STEP translators.
The next frontier for
STEP is manufacturing applications. New STEP models are being
developed for milling, turning and EDM applications. It is
anticipated that in the future CAM systems will write data to these
models and NC Controllers will read it and use it to control the
manufacture of parts. The benefits predicted include a 35% reduction
in the time required to set up a job, elimination of post processors
and faster, safer, more intelligent machine tool
controllers.
Complete Product
Modeling For Product Realization
Bill
Simons, IT System Engineer, Staff,
Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies *
For years, the manufacturing community has been striving to increase
levels of automation and integration for product realization. This
is particularly evident in the area of product design. CAD tools
have taken advantage of feature-based solid modeling technology to
realize dramatic productivity benefits. While software tools
designed to facilitate pre-production manufacturing activities (i.e.
process design and part program generation) are now starting to take
advantage of these technologies, more often than not these
activities are still being accomplished using outdated,
time-intensive tools and techniques.
One of
the key enablers of an effective product realization environment is
a complete and unambiguous digital product model. This model would
provide shape and non-shape, model based information about the
product. Product information would not be limited to design and
configuration management, but would also incorporate integrated
manufacturing information. It would utilize multiple, integrated
feature definitions facilitating integration of and communication
between design and manufacturing processes throughout the product
realization life cycle.
FBÔ -Tol
(Feature-BasedÔ Tolerancing) and FBÔ -Mach (Feature-BasedÔ
Machining) developed at the NNSA’s (U.S. National Nuclear Security
Administration’s) Kansas City Plant were designed to move us closer
to realization of a complete and unambiguous digital product model.
FBTol augments a solid model with tolerances and other non-shape
product information. FBMach augments a solid model with machining
features, and integrated manufacturing information. These two
software components are integrated together in an architecture that
facilitates multiple feature definitions, and standards based
information sharing. FBMach and FBTol serve as foundational
components for several product realization applications being
developed at the Kansas City Plant.
One of these
applications, FB-Machining Advisor will import a solid model and
augment it with feature-based tolerance, product configuration
management, and manufacturing information. It provides tools for
automatic machining feature recognition, as well as interactive
machining feature construction. Feature-Based tolerance information
is integrated with the machining features to enable intelligent
process plan design. In-process models and volumetric N/C features
are automatically generated and used to facilitate down-stream
applications (i.e. work instruction generation, and part
programming). Dramatic productivity gains have already been
demonstrated with the use of feature-based tools and further
benefits in productivity and quality are anticipated.
*Operated for the
United States Department of Energy under Contract No.
DE-ACO4-01AL66850 |